The new version of Apple Music, which Apple recently announced has 13 million users so far, focuses on a redesigned user-interface, a few new functions, and reorganization as well as simplification of existing features. The new user-interface ditches the current colorful and translucent look in favor of a simpler design that emphasizes black and white backgrounds and text. For instance, the user interface in the albums view will no longer change in appearance based on the color of a particular album’s art. While the new interface will eschew color in the user-interface, album artwork will become “huge” and a larger part of the interface in order to avoid a dull black and white look, according to people who have seen the updated Apple Music service.
Apple’s music apps have grown in size as new features are bolted on, and it has been a point of discussion for many, including Daring Fireball’s Jon Gruber:
This is a good test for today’s Apple on two fronts. First, will they actually succeed in streamlining the interface to Apple Music? I still think the most obvious solution is to make Apple Music its own standalone app. “All your music in one app” sounds like a great idea in theory, but in practice, I believe that is what has led to the confusing UI. It’s yet another major feature added to iTunes on Mac and Windows — an app that everyone seems to agree already has too many features and responsibilities. What do you see when you open the Spotify or Pandora apps? Just the streaming music you have access to. That makes them less complicated, by definition.
“Everything you see is in the cloud, and you have access to it because you are a subscriber” is easy to understand. “Some of this is in the cloud, some of this you own” is more complicated.
China Defeats iPhone In Legal Case
Apple has suffered a defeat in the Chinese courts over the use of ‘iPhone’ as a trademark. Although Apple holds the name when it is associated with software and hardware, it challenged another use of it, specifically Xintong Tiandi Technology’s range of leather products named iPhone… Forbes Casey Hall:
Apple appealed an earlier decision to the Beijing Municipal High People’s Court to stop Xintong Tiandi Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. from using the “IPHONE” name, which the Chinese company first trademarked in 2007 for the leather product category – this category, and the company’s current assembly of products (as seen on their website) includes leather phone cases, passport covers and handbags.
Though Apple holds the trademark to the “iPhone” name for computer software and hardware, on March 30 the court upheld an earlier ruling, from 2013, which found that Apple could not prove that “IPHONE” was already a well-known name in China in 2007, when Xintong Tiandi trademarked it for its leather goods. As such, the 2013 ruling reads in part, “the general public will not link the trademark in dispute with Apple to harm its [Apple’s] interests.” Apple did not start selling iPhones in China until 2009.
Hall takes a closer look at the legal case here on Forbes. BBC News has also covered the story.
The Apple Watch (image: Apple.com)
The Apple Watch (image: Apple.com)
And Finally…
Would you like to install an alternate operating system on your Apple Watch? If so, Nick Lee can help you. Here comes Microsoft’s Windows 95 to your wrist. The only catch? The boot time…
Windows 95, 8 GB of storage and half a gig of RAM is an embarrassment of riches. It’s an embarrassment of riches. Only problem is, you’re not going to get the cycles you’d like out of that 520Mhz processor, since it’s an emulator, not a virtual machine.
It seems there’s a way to get a WatchKit app to load arbitrary code, even if that code happens to be a port of a port of an x86 emulator apparently held together with chewing gum and a desperate prayer.
Result: Lee had to affix a tiny motor to the crown to spin it constantly during the hour-long boot process
Get ready to ctrl-alt-delete on the Apple Watch at TechCrunch.
Apple Loop brings you seven days worth of highlights every weekend here on Forbes. Don’t forget to follow me so you don’t miss any coverage in the future. Last week’s Apple Loop can be read here, or this week’s edition of Loop’s sister column,